Skip to main content
BDV (670W class) vs BDV-F2-EU (670W) 18 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)

Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
18 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 18 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
BDV (670W class)
22,655 kWh
BDV-F2-EU (670W)
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BDV (670W class) BDV-F2-EU (670W)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 644 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 618 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 592 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BDV (670W class) BDV-F2-EU (670W) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 670 Wp Same
Module efficiency 24.80 % 24.80 % Same
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 50.98 V 50.98 V Same
Voltage at max power 43.09 V 43.09 V Same
Short-circuit current 16.22 A 16.22 A Same
Current at max power 15.55 A 15.55 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.5 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #12
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#14 vs #14
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,321 vs #2,321
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#486 vs #486
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
One difference: cell technology
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) or Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670 W) is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) use vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670 W) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670 W) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670 W) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.