Skip to main content
665 vs 670 16 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670

JS210MHC132-665
665 Wp 21.40 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS210MHC132-670
670 Wp 21.60 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

670 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 16 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See the one difference
How alike are they
16 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 17 parameters
Parameter 665 670 Difference
Module efficiency 21.40 % 21.60 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
665
22,073 kWh
670
22,239 kWh
Lifetime gap
166 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 665 670
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 631 W 636 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 597 W 602 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 563 W 567 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 665 670 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 670 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.40 % 21.60 % +0.20 pp for 670
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 215.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 46.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 38.01 V 38.21 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.57 A 18.62 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.50 A 17.54 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.0 kg 34.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 50.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,323 vs #7,652
670 leads by 671 places
Power density
#8,250 vs #7,644
670 leads by 606 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,471 vs #4,151
670 leads by 320 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,248 vs #5,799
670 leads by 449 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 has higher module efficiency (21.60% vs 21.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 is 21.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.