Skip to main content
JS210MHC132-665 vs JS210MHC120-605 10 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605

JS210MHC132-665
665 Wp 21.40 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
JS210MHC120-605
605 Wp 21.40 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JS210MHC132-665 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 60 W more power. 10 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
10 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

7 of 17 parameters
Parameter JS210MHC132-665 JS210MHC120-605 Difference
Rated power 665 Wp 605 Wp 60 W more power
Weight 34.0 kg 30.6 kg 3.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 41.70 V 4.20 V apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 38.01 V 34.50 V 3.51 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS210MHC132-665
22,073 kWh
JS210MHC120-605
20,081 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,992 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS210MHC132-665 JS210MHC120-605
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 605 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 631 W 574 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 597 W 543 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 563 W 512 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS210MHC132-665 JS210MHC120-605 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 605 Wp +60 W for JS210MHC132-665
Module efficiency 21.40 % 21.40 % Same
Power density 214.1 Wp/m² 213.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 41.70 V 4.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.01 V 34.50 V 3.51 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.57 A 18.57 A Same
Current at max power 17.50 A 17.54 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 34.0 kg 30.6 kg -3.4 kg for JS210MHC120-605
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 50.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,323 vs #8,323
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#8,250 vs #8,350
JS210MHC132-665 leads by 100 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,471 vs #3,986
JS210MHC120-605 leads by 485 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,248 vs #8,552
JS210MHC132-665 leads by 2,304 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.