Skip to main content
JS182MHC132-510 vs JS182MHC144-540 8 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540

JS182MHC132-510
510 Wp 21.47 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS182MHC144-540
540 Wp 20.89 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JS182MHC132-510 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 8 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
8 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

9 of 17 parameters
Parameter JS182MHC132-510 JS182MHC144-540 Difference
Module efficiency 21.47 % 20.89 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Rated power 510 Wp 540 Wp 30 W more power
Module area 2.375 m² 2.584 m² 0.210 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 49.50 V 3.90 V apart
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 208.9 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 38.40 V 41.60 V 3.20 V apart
Dimensions 2094x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2094x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JS182MHC132-510
17,112 kWh
JS182MHC144-540
18,118 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,006 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS182MHC132-510 JS182MHC144-540
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 540 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 484 W 512 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 458 W 483 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 432 W 455 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS182MHC132-510 JS182MHC144-540 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 540 Wp +30 W for JS182MHC144-540
Module efficiency 21.47 % 20.89 % +0.58 pp for JS182MHC132-510
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 208.9 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for JS182MHC132-510
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 49.50 V 3.90 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.40 V 41.60 V 3.20 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.94 A 13.83 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.39 A 12.98 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for JS182MHC132-510
Mechanical
Dimensions 2094x1134x30 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2094x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.375 m² 2.584 m² 0.210 m² apart
Weight 26.0 kg 26.5 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,240 vs #10,294
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 2,054 places
Power density
#8,130 vs #10,202
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 2,072 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #10,419
JS182MHC132-510 leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#4,341 vs #2,710
JS182MHC144-540 leads by 1,631 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,867 vs #10,641
JS182MHC144-540 leads by 226 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has higher module efficiency (21.47% vs 20.89%); Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a module efficiency of 21.47%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540 is 20.89%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 174 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.