Skip to main content
510 vs 505 17 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505

JS182MHC132-510
510 Wp 21.47 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS182MHC132-505
505 Wp 21.30 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 17 comparable parameters agree, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
17 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 17 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
510
16,928 kWh
505
16,762 kWh
Lifetime gap
166 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 510 505
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 505 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 484 W 479 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 458 W 453 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 432 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 510 505 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 505 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.47 % 21.30 % Effectively the same
Power density 214.8 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 45.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 38.40 V 38.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.94 A 13.88 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.39 A 13.32 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2094x1134x30 mm 2094x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.375 m² 2.375 m² Same
Weight 26.0 kg 26.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 51.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,240 vs #8,519
510 leads by 279 places
Power density
#8,130 vs #8,757
510 leads by 627 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,341 vs #4,854
510 leads by 513 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,867 vs #11,082
510 leads by 215 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has higher module efficiency (21.47% vs 21.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a module efficiency of 21.47%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 is 21.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.