Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class)
VS
The verdict
BDV-F2-EU (665W) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.56 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
3 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
BDV-F2-EU (665W)
BDV (650W class)
Difference
Module efficiency
24.62 %
24.06 %
0.56 pp more efficient
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
240.6 Wp/m²
5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
665 Wp
650 Wp
15 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
BDV-F2-EU (665W)
22,486 kWh
BDV (650W class)
21,978 kWh
Lifetime gap
508 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
BDV-F2-EU (665W)
BDV (650W class)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
650 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
639 W
625 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
613 W
599 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
587 W
574 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
BDV-F2-EU (665W)
BDV (650W class)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
650 Wp
+15 W for BDV-F2-EU (665W)
Module efficiency
24.62 %
24.06 %
+0.56 pp for BDV-F2-EU (665W)
Power density
246.2 Wp/m²
240.6 Wp/m²
+5.6 Wp/m² for BDV-F2-EU (665W)
Open-circuit voltage
50.80 V
50.26 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.96 V
42.57 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.16 A
15.98 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.48 A
15.27 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
32.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
48.9 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#42
vs
#268
BDV-F2-EU (665W) leads by 226 places
Power density
#42
vs
#233
BDV-F2-EU (665W) leads by 191 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,555
vs
#3,317
BDV-F2-EU (665W) leads by 762 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#634
vs
#1,166
BDV-F2-EU (665W) leads by 532 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) vs Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
One difference: cell technology
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) or Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665 W) has higher module efficiency (24.62% vs 24.06%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665 W) has a module efficiency of 24.62%, while Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650 W class) is 24.06%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) use vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665 W) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650 W class) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665 W) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650 W class) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650W class) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665 W) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (650 W class) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
