Skip to main content
315 vs 320 16 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2060-320

JA Solar MYM2060-315
MYM2060-315
315 Wp 19.36 % PERC Incomplete
VS
JA Solar MYM2060-320
MYM2060-320
320 Wp 19.67 % PERC Incomplete
The verdict

320 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.31 pp more efficient. 16 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 2 differences
How alike are they
16 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

2 of 18 parameters
Parameter 315 320 Difference
Module efficiency 19.36 % 19.67 % 0.31 pp more efficient
Power density 193.6 Wp/m² 196.7 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
315
10,569 kWh
320
10,737 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 315 320
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 315 W 320 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 298 W 302 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 280 W 284 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 263 W 267 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 315 320 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 315 Wp 320 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 19.36 % 19.67 % +0.31 pp for 320
Power density 193.6 Wp/m² 196.7 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for 320
Open-circuit voltage 40.70 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.10 V 33.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 9.96 A 10.10 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 9.52 A 9.61 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1640x992x40 mm 1640x992x40 mm Same
Module area 1.627 m² 1.627 m² Same
Weight 18.5 kg 18.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.7 kg/kWp 57.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 60 60 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,774 vs #12,559
320 leads by 215 places
Power density
#12,748 vs #12,528
320 leads by 220 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,867 vs #11,428
320 leads by 439 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#13,080 vs #13,005
320 leads by 75 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2072-385
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2072-380
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2072-375
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2072-370
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2072-365
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2060-315 vs JA Solar MYM2060-325
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar MYM2060-315 or JA Solar MYM2060-320?
According to our database: JA Solar MYM2060-320 has higher module efficiency (19.67% vs 19.36%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar MYM2060-315 and JA Solar MYM2060-320?
JA Solar MYM2060-315 has a module efficiency of 19.36%, while JA Solar MYM2060-320 is 19.67%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar MYM2060-315 use vs JA Solar MYM2060-320?
JA Solar MYM2060-315 uses PERC cells; JA Solar MYM2060-320 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar MYM2060-315 and JA Solar MYM2060-320?
JA Solar MYM2060-315 has a 25 years power warranty; JA Solar MYM2060-320 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 390 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.