Skip to main content
635/LB vs 625/LB 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB

JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB
JAM72D42-635/LB
635 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB
JAM72D42-625/LB
625 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

635/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 635/LB 625/LB Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.40 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 227.2 Wp/m² 223.6 Wp/m² 3.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 635 Wp 625 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
635/LB
21,306 kWh
625/LB
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 635/LB 625/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 607 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 580 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 552 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 635/LB 625/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 635 Wp 625 Wp +10 W for 635/LB
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.40 % +0.30 pp for 635/LB
Power density 227.2 Wp/m² 223.6 Wp/m² +3.6 Wp/m² for 635/LB
Open-circuit voltage 52.67 V 52.27 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.10 V 43.71 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.26 A 15.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.40 A 14.30 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.795 m² 2.795 m² Same
Weight 34.6 kg 34.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 55.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #4,774
635/LB leads by 1,467 places
Power density
#3,252 vs #4,955
635/LB leads by 1,703 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,832 vs #9,802
635/LB leads by 970 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,396 vs #3,028
635/LB leads by 632 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-650/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-645/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-640/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB or JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB and JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 393 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.