Skip to main content
JAM72D40-600/MB vs JAM66D45-610/LB 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB

JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB
JAM72D40-600/MB
600 Wp 23.20 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB
JAM66D45-610/LB
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM72D40-600/MB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM72D40-600/MB JAM66D45-610/LB Difference
Module efficiency 23.20 % 22.60 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 52.79 V 48.10 V 4.69 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.04 A 16.05 A 2.01 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.701 m² 0.118 m² apart
Rated power 600 Wp 610 Wp 10 W more power
Voltage at max power 44.85 V 39.77 V 5.08 V apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Current at max power 13.38 A 15.34 A 1.96 A apart
Weight 31.8 kg 33.1 kg 1.3 kg lighter
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM72D40-600/MB
20,131 kWh
JAM66D45-610/LB
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM72D40-600/MB JAM66D45-610/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 574 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 548 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 522 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM72D40-600/MB JAM66D45-610/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 610 Wp +10 W for JAM66D45-610/LB
Module efficiency 23.20 % 22.60 % +0.60 pp for JAM72D40-600/MB
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for JAM72D40-600/MB
Open-circuit voltage 52.79 V 48.10 V 4.69 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.85 V 39.77 V 5.08 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.04 A 16.05 A 2.01 A apart
Current at max power 13.38 A 15.34 A 1.96 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.701 m² 0.118 m² apart
Weight 31.8 kg 33.1 kg -1.3 kg for JAM72D40-600/MB
Weight per kWp 53.0 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,269 panels
Efficiency
#1,390 vs #3,785
JAM72D40-600/MB leads by 2,395 places
Power density
#1,336 vs #3,857
JAM72D40-600/MB leads by 2,521 places
Heat behaviour
#2,260 vs #2,260
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,832 vs #8,656
JAM72D40-600/MB leads by 1,824 places
Warranty
#31 vs #31
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,054 vs #3,380
JAM72D40-600/MB leads by 326 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM78D40-620/MB/1500V
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM78D40-615/MB/1500V
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM78D40-610/MB/1500V
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-605/MB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB vs JA Solar JAM78D40-605/MB/1500V
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB or JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB has higher module efficiency (23.20% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB and JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB use vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB and JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB and JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM72D40-600/MB and JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 300 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.