Skip to main content
YH720W-33MHD/MH vs GSD8K66H-740WT 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT

IBC Solar
YH720W-33MHD/MH
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT
Sharp
GSD8K66H-740WT
740 Wp 23.82 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

GSD8K66H-740WT leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.090 %/°C better in heat. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH GSD8K66H-740WT Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.090 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.82 % 0.64 pp more efficient
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 720 Wp 740 Wp 20 W more power
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Open-circuit voltage 49.82 V 51.70 V 1.88 V apart
Weight 38.0 kg 39.0 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 43.80 V 2.28 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
GSD8K66H-740WT
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario YH720W-33MHD/MH GSD8K66H-740WT
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 682 W 711 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 644 W 682 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 607 W 653 W
03

Full specification

Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH GSD8K66H-740WT Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 740 Wp +20 W for GSD8K66H-740WT
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.82 % +0.64 pp for GSD8K66H-740WT
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-740WT
Open-circuit voltage 49.82 V 51.70 V 1.88 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 43.80 V 2.28 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.13 A 17.76 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.34 A 16.91 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.090 %/°C for GSD8K66H-740WT
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 39.0 kg -1.0 kg for YH720W-33MHD/MH
Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for YH720W-33MHD/MH
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.35 %/yr Not published by IBC Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #418
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 1,006 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #431
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 916 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #511
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 9,908 places
Weight
#6,459 vs #6,344
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 115 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#24 vs #12
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 12 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-730WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-725WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-720WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH or Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 23.18%); Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT is 23.82%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH use vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon cells; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT bifacial panels?
Both IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare IBC Solar and Sharp as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers · See 6 Sharp offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.