Skip to main content
HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs HiS-T630NJ 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiS-T630NJ

Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
450 Wp 22.50 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
HiS-T630NJ
630 Wp 22.54 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) HiS-T630NJ Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 450 Wp 630 Wp 180 W more power
Weight 21.6 kg 34.7 kg 13.1 kg lighter
Product warranty 30 yrs 12 yrs 18 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 7.1 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 36.72 V 57.36 V 20.64 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.795 m² 0.797 m² apart
Short-circuit current 15.53 A 13.90 A 1.63 A apart
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 30.83 V 47.41 V 16.58 V apart
Cell count 96 156 60 cells apart
Current at max power 14.60 A 13.29 A 1.31 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
15,333 kWh
HiS-T630NJ
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,805 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) HiS-T630NJ
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 434 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 418 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 401 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) HiS-T630NJ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 630 Wp +180 W for HiS-T630NJ
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.54 % Effectively the same
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 225.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 36.72 V 57.36 V 20.64 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.83 V 47.41 V 16.58 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.53 A 13.90 A 1.63 A apart
Current at max power 14.60 A 13.29 A 1.31 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.795 m² 0.797 m² apart
Weight 21.6 kg 34.7 kg -13.1 kg for HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp -7.1 kg/kWp for HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 12 yrs +18 yrs for HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB)
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 156 60 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #3,920
HiS-T630NJ leads by 302 places
Power density
#4,225 vs #3,907
HiS-T630NJ leads by 318 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #2,165
HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#2,004 vs #9,493
HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) leads by 7,489 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,058 vs #2,702
HiS-T630NJ leads by 2,356 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H455LE-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H445LE-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H440LE-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiS-T630NJ vs Hyundai HiS-T640NJ
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiS-T630NJ vs Hyundai HiS-T635NJ
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) or Hyundai HiS-T630NJ?
According to our database: Hyundai HiS-T630NJ has higher module efficiency (22.54% vs 22.50%); Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) and Hyundai HiS-T630NJ?
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Hyundai HiS-T630NJ is 22.54%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) use vs Hyundai HiS-T630NJ?
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) uses HJT cells; Hyundai HiS-T630NJ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) and Hyundai HiS-T630NJ?
Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) has a 30 years power warranty; Hyundai HiS-T630NJ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) and Hyundai HiS-T630NJ bifacial panels?
Both Hyundai HiT-H450LE-FB(ZB) and Hyundai HiS-T630NJ are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.