Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK

Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK
485 Wp
24.30 %
Back Contact
Bifacial
VS

Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK
480 Wp
24.00 %
Back Contact
Bifacial
The verdict
485WP FULL BLACK leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See the one differenceHow alike are they
18
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
1 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
485WP FULL BLACK
480W FULL BLACK
Difference
Module efficiency
24.30 %
24.00 %
0.30 pp more efficient
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
485WP FULL BLACK
15,972 kWh
480W FULL BLACK
15,807 kWh
Lifetime gap
165 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
485WP FULL BLACK
480W FULL BLACK
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
480 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
466 W
461 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
447 W
443 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
428 W
424 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
485WP FULL BLACK
480W FULL BLACK
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
480 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
24.30 %
24.00 %
+0.30 pp for 485WP FULL BLACK
Power density
242.7 Wp/m²
240.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
41.00 V
40.90 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
34.60 V
34.50 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.84 A
14.80 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.02 A
13.92 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.2 kg
24.2 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#131
vs
#303
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 172 places
Power density
#140
vs
#294
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 154 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,275
vs
#3,794
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 519 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,068
vs
#2,472
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 404 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP PERFORMANCE
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485W FULL BLACK
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP Full Black
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK or Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK?
According to our database: Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 24.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK is 24.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK use vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK uses Back Contact cells; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK has a 30 years power warranty; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK bifacial panels?
Both Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 15 Heckert Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.