Skip to main content
480W FULL BLACK vs 485WP FULL BLACK 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK

Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK
Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK
480 Wp 24.00 % Back Contact Bifacial
VS
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK
Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact Bifacial
The verdict

485WP FULL BLACK leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter 480W FULL BLACK 485WP FULL BLACK Difference
Module efficiency 24.00 % 24.30 % 0.30 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
480W FULL BLACK
15,807 kWh
485WP FULL BLACK
15,972 kWh
Lifetime gap
165 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 480W FULL BLACK 485WP FULL BLACK
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 480 W 485 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 461 W 466 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 443 W 447 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 424 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 480W FULL BLACK 485WP FULL BLACK Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 480 Wp 485 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 24.00 % 24.30 % +0.30 pp for 485WP FULL BLACK
Power density 240.2 Wp/m² 242.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 40.90 V 41.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.50 V 34.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.80 A 14.84 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.92 A 14.02 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.2 kg 24.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 49.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#303 vs #131
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 172 places
Power density
#294 vs #140
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 154 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,794 vs #3,275
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 519 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,472 vs #2,068
485WP FULL BLACK leads by 404 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP
3 differences, the largest is module area
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP PERFORMANCE
3 differences, the largest is module area
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485W FULL BLACK
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP Full Black
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK or Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK?
According to our database: Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 24.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK has a module efficiency of 24.00%, while Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK use vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK uses Back Contact cells; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK has a 30 years power warranty; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480W FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK bifacial panels?
Both Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 480 W FULL BLACK and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP FULL BLACK are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 15 Heckert Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.