Skip to main content
E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs H1+/AC (Power class 440W) 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)

Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W)
Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W)
425 Wp 21.80 % N-type
VS
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
440 Wp 22.50 % N-type
The verdict

H1+/AC (Power class 440W) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter E1+/AC (Power class 425W) H1+/AC (Power class 440W) Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.50 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 425 Wp 440 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E1+/AC (Power class 425W)
14,338 kWh
H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
14,844 kWh
Lifetime gap
506 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E1+/AC (Power class 425W) H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 425 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 406 W 420 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 387 W 400 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 368 W 381 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E1+/AC (Power class 425W) H1+/AC (Power class 440W) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 425 Wp 440 Wp +15 W for H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.50 % +0.70 pp for H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 39.88 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.74 V 33.33 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.66 A 13.90 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.98 A 13.20 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x40 mm 1722x1134x40 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 22.9 kg 22.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 52.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 216 216 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #4,222
H1+/AC (Power class 440W) leads by 2,800 places
Power density
#7,172 vs #4,099
H1+/AC (Power class 440W) leads by 3,073 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,183 vs #5,625
H1+/AC (Power class 440W) leads by 2,558 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,093 vs #7,682
H1+/AC (Power class 440W) leads by 1,411 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.D1+/AC (Power class 435W)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.1+/AC (Power class 420W)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+/AC (Power class 415W)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
15 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
16 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) or Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440 W) has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425 W) has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440 W) is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425 W) uses N-type cells; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440 W) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W) and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425 W) has a 25 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440 W) has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 20 Q-Cells offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.