3SHBGH-C#-625 vs HY-NT10/72GDF-610W 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Q: Which panel is better: GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 or GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.10%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 has a module efficiency of 22.10%, while GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 use vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 uses HJT cells; GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

GL Solar

3SHBGH-C#-625

625 Wp 22.10 % HJT Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

GL Solar

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

610 Wp 23.60 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.50 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences

How alike are they

5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters

Parameter 3SHBGH-C#-625 HY-NT10/72GDF-610W Difference

Module efficiency 22.10 % 23.60 % 1.50 pp more efficient

Power density 220.8 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² 15.3 Wp/m² higher

Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat

Weight 36.0 kg 32.1 kg 3.9 kg lighter

Open-circuit voltage 45.55 V 52.95 V 7.40 V apart

Short-circuit current 17.44 A 14.37 A 3.07 A apart

Module area 2.830 m² 2.583 m² 0.247 m² apart

Weight per kWp 57.6 kg/kWp 52.6 kg/kWp 5.0 kg/kWp lighter

Rated power 625 Wp 610 Wp 15 W more power

Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon

Voltage at max power 38.32 V 44.94 V 6.62 V apart

Current at max power 16.31 A 13.58 A 2.73 A apart

Cell count 120 144 24 cells apart

Dimensions 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

3SHBGH-C#-625

20,745 kWh

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

20,467 kWh

Lifetime gap

278 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 3SHBGH-C#-625 HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 625 W 610 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 601 W 583 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 576 W 557 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 552 W 530 W

Full specification

Parameter 3SHBGH-C#-625 HY-NT10/72GDF-610W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 625 Wp 610 Wp +15 W for 3SHBGH-C#-625

Module efficiency 22.10 % 23.60 % +1.50 pp for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Power density 220.8 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² +15.3 Wp/m² for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Open-circuit voltage 45.55 V 52.95 V 7.40 V apart

Voltage at max power 38.32 V 44.94 V 6.62 V apart

Short-circuit current 17.44 A 14.37 A 3.07 A apart

Current at max power 16.31 A 13.58 A 2.73 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for 3SHBGH-C#-625

Mechanical

Dimensions 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm

Module area 2.830 m² 2.583 m² 0.247 m² apart

Weight 36.0 kg 32.1 kg -3.9 kg for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Weight per kWp 57.6 kg/kWp 52.6 kg/kWp -5.0 kg/kWp for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 120 144 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#6,012 vs #627

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 5,385 places

Power density

#6,022 vs #623

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 5,399 places

Heat behaviour

#511 vs #2,165

3SHBGH-C#-625 leads by 1,654 places

Weight

#11,308 vs #6,249

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 5,059 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#2,801 vs #1,815

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 986 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-640

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-620

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-615

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-610

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 or GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.10%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 has a module efficiency of 22.10%, while GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 use vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 uses HJT cells; GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W?

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-625 and GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 GL Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.