Skip to main content
Magnus 510 vs SOLID Framed Transparent 505 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505

Solitek
Magnus 510
510 Wp 22.93 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Solitek
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
505 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Magnus 510 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.62 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter Magnus 510 SOLID Framed Transparent 505 Difference
Module efficiency 22.93 % 22.31 % 0.62 pp more efficient
Power density 229.3 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² 6.2 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 14.25 A 1.70 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 39.06 V 42.28 V 3.22 V apart
Cell count 108 120 12 cells apart
Module area 2.224 m² 2.263 m² 0.040 m² apart
Voltage at max power 33.34 V 36.47 V 3.13 V apart
Current at max power 15.30 A 13.85 A 1.45 A apart
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 1996x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 1996x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
Magnus 510
17,351 kWh
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
17,181 kWh
Lifetime gap
170 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario Magnus 510 SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 505 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 487 W 482 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 464 W 460 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 441 W 437 W
03

Full specification

Parameter Magnus 510 SOLID Framed Transparent 505 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 505 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.93 % 22.31 % +0.62 pp for Magnus 510
Power density 229.3 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² +6.2 Wp/m² for Magnus 510
Open-circuit voltage 39.06 V 42.28 V 3.22 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.34 V 36.47 V 3.13 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 14.25 A 1.70 A apart
Current at max power 15.30 A 13.85 A 1.45 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 1996x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 1996x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.224 m² 2.263 m² 0.040 m² apart
Weight 28.5 kg 29.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 55.9 kg/kWp 57.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.31 %/yr 0.31 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,342 vs #5,082
Magnus 510 leads by 2,740 places
Power density
#2,343 vs #5,068
Magnus 510 leads by 2,725 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,261 vs #11,209
Magnus 510 leads by 948 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,694 vs #3,634
Magnus 510 leads by 940 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek Forza 720
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek SOLID Framed White 720W
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek Forza 650
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek SOLID Framed White 650W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek SOLRIF D Black 455
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek Magnus 510 vs Solitek SOLID Semi-Clear Framed 455 W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solitek Magnus 510 or Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505?
According to our database: Solitek Magnus 510 has higher module efficiency (22.93% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solitek Magnus 510 and Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505?
Solitek Magnus 510 has a module efficiency of 22.93%, while Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solitek Magnus 510 use vs Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505?
Solitek Magnus 510 uses TOPCon cells; Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solitek Magnus 510 and Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505?
Solitek Magnus 510 has a 30 years power warranty; Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solitek Magnus 510 and Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 bifacial panels?
Both Solitek Magnus 510 and Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 20 Solitek offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.