GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
VS
The verdict
NT12R/48GDF-455W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NT12R/48GDF-455W
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Difference
Module efficiency
22.77 %
22.00 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Power density
227.7 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
7.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
455 Wp
430 Wp
25 W more power
Weight
24.5 kg
21.2 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
35.30 V
39.32 V
4.02 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.00 A
13.74 A
2.26 A apart
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
0.07 %/yr slower
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Module area
1.998 m²
1.953 m²
0.045 m² apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
13.05 A
2.15 A apart
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Voltage at max power
29.94 V
32.94 V
3.00 V apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NT12R/48GDF-455W
15,266 kWh
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
14,507 kWh
Lifetime gap
759 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NT12R/48GDF-455W
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
455 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
435 W
411 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
415 W
393 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
396 W
374 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NT12R/48GDF-455W
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
455 Wp
430 Wp
+25 W for NT12R/48GDF-455W
Module efficiency
22.77 %
22.00 %
+0.77 pp for NT12R/48GDF-455W
Power density
227.7 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
+7.5 Wp/m² for NT12R/48GDF-455W
Open-circuit voltage
35.30 V
39.32 V
4.02 V apart
Voltage at max power
29.94 V
32.94 V
3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.00 A
13.74 A
2.26 A apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
13.05 A
2.15 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
1.953 m²
0.045 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
21.2 kg
-3.3 kg for Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
-4.5 kg/kWp for Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for NT12R/48GDF-455W
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
-0.07 %/yr for Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,073
vs
#6,517
NT12R/48GDF-455W leads by 3,444 places
Power density
#2,888
vs
#6,481
NT12R/48GDF-455W leads by 3,593 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,897
vs
#2,855
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 leads by 5,042 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,798
NT12R/48GDF-455W leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#8,644
vs
#8,637
Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 leads by 7 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-530
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL NT12R/54GDF-525W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-525
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL NT12R/54BGDF-520W
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL NT12R/54GDF-520W
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W vs GCL GCL-NT12R/54GDF-520
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W or Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430?
According to our database: GCL NT12R/48GDF-455 W has higher module efficiency (22.77% vs 22.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430?
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455 W has a module efficiency of 22.77%, while Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430?
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455 W uses TOPCon cells; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430?
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455 W has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL NT12R/48GDF-455W and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 bifacial panels?
GCL NT12R/48GDF-455 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers · See 25 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
