Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX560MB(144)182
VS
The verdict
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.70 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
EX605TC-144HC182BF
EX560MB(144)182
Difference
Module efficiency
23.40 %
21.70 %
1.70 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.070 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
605 Wp
560 Wp
45 W more power
Power density
234.1 Wp/m²
216.7 Wp/m²
17.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight
31.5 kg
27.3 kg
4.2 kg lighter
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
48.8 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
51.95 V
50.15 V
1.80 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Voltage at max power
43.76 V
42.27 V
1.49 V apart
Current at max power
13.83 A
13.25 A
0.58 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
EX605TC-144HC182BF
20,299 kWh
EX560MB(144)182
18,789 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,510 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
EX605TC-144HC182BF
EX560MB(144)182
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
560 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
580 W
531 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
554 W
501 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
529 W
472 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
EX605TC-144HC182BF
EX560MB(144)182
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
560 Wp
+45 W for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Module efficiency
23.40 %
21.70 %
+1.70 pp for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Power density
234.1 Wp/m²
216.7 Wp/m²
+17.4 Wp/m² for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Open-circuit voltage
51.95 V
50.15 V
1.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.76 V
42.27 V
1.49 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.62 A
14.14 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.83 A
13.25 A
0.58 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.070 %/°C for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2279x1134 mm
2279x1134 mm
Same
Module area
2.584 m²
2.584 m²
Same
Weight
31.5 kg
27.3 kg
-4.2 kg for EX560MB(144)182
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
48.8 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for EX560MB(144)182
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#882
vs
#7,421
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 6,539 places
Power density
#895
vs
#7,538
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 6,643 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#10,419
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 9,110 places
Weight
#5,508
vs
#2,441
EX560MB(144)182 leads by 3,067 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#991
vs
#3,301
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 2,310 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX600TC-144HC182BF
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX595TC-144HC182BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX590TC-144HC182BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX585TC-144HC182BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX555MB(144)182
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX550MB(144)182
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF or Exiom EX560MB(144)182?
According to our database: Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF has higher module efficiency (23.40% vs 21.70%); Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF and Exiom EX560MB(144)182?
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF has a module efficiency of 23.40%, while Exiom EX560MB(144)182 is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF use vs Exiom EX560MB(144)182?
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF uses TOPCon cells; Exiom EX560MB(144)182 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF and Exiom EX560MB(144)182?
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF has a 30 years power warranty; Exiom EX560MB(144)182 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF and Exiom EX560MB(144)182 bifacial panels?
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Exiom EX560MB(144)182 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Exiom offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.