Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF
VS
The verdict
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.70 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
EX560MB(144)182
EX605TC-144HC182BF
Difference
Module efficiency
21.70 %
23.40 %
1.70 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.070 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
560 Wp
605 Wp
45 W more power
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
234.1 Wp/m²
17.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight
27.3 kg
31.5 kg
4.2 kg lighter
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Weight per kWp
48.8 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
50.15 V
51.95 V
1.80 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
42.27 V
43.76 V
1.49 V apart
Current at max power
13.25 A
13.83 A
0.58 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
EX560MB(144)182
18,789 kWh
EX605TC-144HC182BF
20,299 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,510 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
EX560MB(144)182
EX605TC-144HC182BF
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
605 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
531 W
580 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
501 W
554 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
472 W
529 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
EX560MB(144)182
EX605TC-144HC182BF
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
605 Wp
+45 W for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Module efficiency
21.70 %
23.40 %
+1.70 pp for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
234.1 Wp/m²
+17.4 Wp/m² for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Open-circuit voltage
50.15 V
51.95 V
1.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.27 V
43.76 V
1.49 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.14 A
14.62 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.25 A
13.83 A
0.58 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.070 %/°C for EX605TC-144HC182BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2279x1134 mm
2279x1134 mm
Same
Module area
2.584 m²
2.584 m²
Same
Weight
27.3 kg
31.5 kg
-4.2 kg for EX560MB(144)182
Weight per kWp
48.8 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for EX560MB(144)182
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,421
vs
#882
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 6,539 places
Power density
#7,538
vs
#895
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 6,643 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#1,309
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 9,110 places
Weight
#2,441
vs
#5,508
EX560MB(144)182 leads by 3,067 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,301
vs
#991
EX605TC-144HC182BF leads by 2,310 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX555MB(144)182
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX550MB(144)182
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX545MB(144)182
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 vs Exiom EX540MB(144)182
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX600TC-144HC182BF
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Exiom
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF vs Exiom EX595TC-144HC182BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Exiom EX560MB(144)182 or Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF?
According to our database: Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF has higher module efficiency (23.40% vs 21.70%); Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Exiom EX560MB(144)182 and Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF?
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF is 23.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Exiom EX560MB(144)182 use vs Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF?
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 uses PERC cells; Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Exiom EX560MB(144)182 and Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF?
Exiom EX560MB(144)182 has a 30 years power warranty; Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Exiom EX560MB(144)182 and Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF bifacial panels?
Exiom EX605TC-144HC182BF is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Exiom EX560MB(144)182 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Exiom offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.