DH156NA-645W vs DH132NC-710 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710

Q: Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W has higher module efficiency (23.10% vs 22.90%); DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W has a module efficiency of 23.10%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

DAS Solar

DAS-DH156NA-645W

645 Wp 23.10 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NC-710

710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

DH132NC-710 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs not published

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters

Parameter DH156NA-645W DH132NC-710 Difference

Rated power 645 Wp 710 Wp 65 W more power

Weight 34.3 kg 38.3 kg 4.0 kg lighter

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat

Open-circuit voltage 56.36 V 48.92 V 7.44 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.53 A 18.42 A 3.89 A apart

Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart

Module efficiency 23.10 % 22.90 % 0.20 pp more efficient

Voltage at max power 46.78 V 40.81 V 5.97 V apart

Current at max power 13.79 A 17.40 A 3.61 A apart

Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

DH156NA-645W

21,641 kWh

DH132NC-710

23,822 kWh

Lifetime gap

2,181 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario DH156NA-645W DH132NC-710

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 710 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 616 W 680 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 587 W 650 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 558 W 621 W

Full specification

Parameter DH156NA-645W DH132NC-710 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 645 Wp 710 Wp +65 W for DH132NC-710

Module efficiency 23.10 % 22.90 % +0.20 pp for DH156NA-645W

Power density 230.7 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 56.36 V 48.92 V 7.44 V apart

Voltage at max power 46.78 V 40.81 V 5.97 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.53 A 18.42 A 3.89 A apart

Current at max power 13.79 A 17.40 A 3.61 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for DH132NC-710

Mechanical

Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart

Weight 34.3 kg 38.3 kg -4.0 kg for DH156NA-645W

Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count - 132 Not published by DAS Solar

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#1,570 vs #2,359

DH156NA-645W leads by 789 places

Power density

#1,654 vs #2,474

DH156NA-645W leads by 820 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #1,309

DH132NC-710 leads by 4,784 places

Weight

#7,008 vs #8,122

DH156NA-645W leads by 1,114 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,496 vs #576

DH132NC-710 leads by 920 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-640W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-635W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-630W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715

The same specification on paper

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645 W has higher module efficiency (23.10% vs 22.90%); DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645 W has a module efficiency of 23.10%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?

DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.