Skip to main content
DH132NC-710 vs DH132NE-650W 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W

DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NC-710
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W
DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NE-650W
650 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH132NE-650W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132NC-710 DH132NE-650W Difference
Module efficiency 22.90 % 24.10 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Rated power 710 Wp 650 Wp 60 W more power
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 240.6 Wp/m² 12.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.3 kg 31.9 kg 6.4 kg lighter
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 16.47 A 1.95 A apart
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 4.9 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 17.40 A 15.67 A 1.73 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH132NC-710
23,822 kWh
DH132NE-650W
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,013 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132NC-710 DH132NE-650W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 650 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 680 W 623 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 650 W 595 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 621 W 568 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132NC-710 DH132NE-650W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 650 Wp +60 W for DH132NC-710
Module efficiency 22.90 % 24.10 % +1.20 pp for DH132NE-650W
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 240.6 Wp/m² +12.1 Wp/m² for DH132NE-650W
Open-circuit voltage 48.92 V 49.38 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.81 V 41.49 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 16.47 A 1.95 A apart
Current at max power 17.40 A 15.67 A 1.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 31.9 kg -6.4 kg for DH132NE-650W
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp -4.9 kg/kWp for DH132NE-650W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #219
DH132NE-650W leads by 2,140 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #233
DH132NE-650W leads by 2,241 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,122 vs #2,720
DH132NE-650W leads by 5,402 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#576 vs #878
DH132NC-710 leads by 302 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-640W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.