Skip to main content
575-H-HC-BF-DG vs 545-H-HC-BF 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF

Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
575 Wp 22.26 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF
Boviet Solar
BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF
545 Wp 20.90 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

575-H-HC-BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.36 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter 575-H-HC-BF-DG 545-H-HC-BF Difference
Module efficiency 22.26 % 20.90 % 1.36 pp more efficient
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 209.3 Wp/m² 13.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 575 Wp 545 Wp 30 W more power
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight 32.0 kg 29.0 kg 3.0 kg lighter
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Weight per kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 14.44 A 13.72 A 0.72 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.604 m² 0.020 m² apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2296x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2296x1134x35 mm
Current at max power 13.55 A 12.82 A 0.73 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
575-H-HC-BF-DG
18,935 kWh
545-H-HC-BF
17,947 kWh
Lifetime gap
988 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 575-H-HC-BF-DG 545-H-HC-BF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 575 W 545 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 543 W 516 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 511 W 488 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 479 W 459 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 575-H-HC-BF-DG 545-H-HC-BF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 575 Wp 545 Wp +30 W for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Module efficiency 22.26 % 20.90 % +1.36 pp for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 209.3 Wp/m² +13.3 Wp/m² for 575-H-HC-BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 50.20 V 49.98 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.46 V 42.58 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.44 A 13.72 A 0.72 A apart
Current at max power 13.55 A 12.82 A 0.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for 545-H-HC-BF
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2296x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2296x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.604 m² 0.020 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 29.0 kg -3.0 kg for 545-H-HC-BF
Weight per kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp -2.4 kg/kWp for 545-H-HC-BF
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,593 vs #10,072
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 4,479 places
Power density
#5,549 vs #9,997
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 4,448 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #10,419
545-H-HC-BF leads by 2,662 places
Weight
#10,019 vs #7,047
545-H-HC-BF leads by 2,972 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,950 vs #7,640
575-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 2,690 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 20.90%); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.350%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF is 20.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF bifacial panels?
Both Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.