AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD
VS
The verdict
ODA730-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.50 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ODA730-33V-MHD
ODA410-27V-MHD
Difference
Module efficiency
23.50 %
21.00 %
2.50 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.223 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.067 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
730 Wp
410 Wp
320 W more power
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
210.0 Wp/m²
25.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.5 kg
24.7 kg
13.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
60.2 kg/kWp
7.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.54 V
37.73 V
11.81 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.79 A
13.91 A
3.88 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.07 %/yr slower
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
44.05 V
31.13 V
12.92 V apart
Current at max power
16.62 A
13.17 A
3.45 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ODA730-33V-MHD
24,640 kWh
ODA410-27V-MHD
13,756 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,884 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ODA730-33V-MHD
ODA410-27V-MHD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
730 W
410 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
706 W
392 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
681 W
374 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
657 W
356 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ODA730-33V-MHD
ODA410-27V-MHD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
730 Wp
410 Wp
+320 W for ODA730-33V-MHD
Module efficiency
23.50 %
21.00 %
+2.50 pp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
210.0 Wp/m²
+25.0 Wp/m² for ODA730-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage
49.54 V
37.73 V
11.81 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.05 V
31.13 V
12.92 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.79 A
13.91 A
3.88 A apart
Current at max power
16.62 A
13.17 A
3.45 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.223 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.067 %/°C for ODA730-33V-MHD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
38.5 kg
24.7 kg
-13.8 kg for ODA410-27V-MHD
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
60.2 kg/kWp
-7.5 kg/kWp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.07 %/yr for ODA730-33V-MHD
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#716
vs
#9,758
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 9,042 places
Power density
#800
vs
#9,772
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 8,972 places
Heat behaviour
#1
vs
#2,165
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 2,164 places
Weight
#6,396
vs
#12,408
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 6,012 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#208
vs
#10,862
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 10,654 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 21.00%); AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.223%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA410-27V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.