Skip to main content
ODA730-33V-MHD vs ODA715-33V-MHD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA730-33V-MHD
730 Wp 23.50 % HJT Bifacial
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA715-33V-MHD
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

ODA730-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA730-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.02 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 730 Wp 715 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA730-33V-MHD
24,640 kWh
ODA715-33V-MHD
24,133 kWh
Lifetime gap
507 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA730-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.7% of rated power 706 W 691 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 93.3% of rated power 681 W 667 W
Hot roof 70 °C 90.0% of rated power 657 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA730-33V-MHD ODA715-33V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 715 Wp +15 W for ODA730-33V-MHD
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.02 % +0.48 pp for ODA730-33V-MHD
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for ODA730-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 49.54 V 49.36 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.05 V 43.66 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.79 A 17.55 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.62 A 16.41 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.223 %/°C -0.223 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #1,797
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 1,081 places
Power density
#800 vs #2,018
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 1,218 places
Heat behaviour
#1 vs #1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,396 vs #7,897
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 1,501 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#208 vs #471
ODA730-33V-MHD leads by 263 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.