Skip to main content
ODA720-33V-MHD vs ODA705-33V-MHD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA720-33V-MHD
720 Wp 23.18 % HJT Bifacial
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA705-33V-MHD
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

ODA720-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA720-33V-MHD ODA705-33V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.70 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 720 Wp 705 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA720-33V-MHD
24,302 kWh
ODA705-33V-MHD
23,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
506 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA720-33V-MHD ODA705-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.7% of rated power 696 W 681 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 93.3% of rated power 672 W 658 W
Hot roof 70 °C 90.0% of rated power 648 W 634 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA720-33V-MHD ODA705-33V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 705 Wp +15 W for ODA720-33V-MHD
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.70 % +0.48 pp for ODA720-33V-MHD
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for ODA720-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 49.42 V 49.24 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.79 V 43.40 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.63 A 17.39 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.48 A 16.27 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.223 %/°C -0.223 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #3,307
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 1,883 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #3,361
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 2,014 places
Heat behaviour
#1 vs #1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,424 vs #8,959
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 1,535 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#362 vs #771
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 409 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.