Skip to main content
ODA720-33V-MHD vs ODA695-33V-MHD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD

AUSTA ENERGY
ODA720-33V-MHD
720 Wp 23.18 % HJT Bifacial
VS
AUSTA ENERGY
ODA695-33V-MHD
695 Wp 22.37 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

ODA720-33V-MHD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.81 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter ODA720-33V-MHD ODA695-33V-MHD Difference
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.37 % 0.81 pp more efficient
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 720 Wp 695 Wp 25 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.223 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ODA720-33V-MHD
24,302 kWh
ODA695-33V-MHD
23,458 kWh
Lifetime gap
844 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ODA720-33V-MHD ODA695-33V-MHD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.7% of rated power 696 W 672 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 93.3% of rated power 672 W 649 W
Hot roof 70 °C 90.0% of rated power 648 W 625 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ODA720-33V-MHD ODA695-33V-MHD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 695 Wp +25 W for ODA720-33V-MHD
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.37 % +0.81 pp for ODA720-33V-MHD
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for ODA720-33V-MHD
Open-circuit voltage 49.42 V 49.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.79 V 43.02 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.63 A 17.22 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.48 A 16.18 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.223 %/°C -0.223 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 55.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.33 %/yr 0.33 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #4,970
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 3,546 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #4,877
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 3,530 places
Heat behaviour
#1 vs #1
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,424 vs #9,818
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 2,394 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#362 vs #1,117
ODA720-33V-MHD leads by 755 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA730-33V-MHD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA725-33V-MHD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA715-33V-MHD
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA710-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA705-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AUSTA ENERGY
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA700-33V-MHD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD or AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
According to our database: AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD use vs AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD uses HJT cells; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD?
AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty; AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD bifacial panels?
Both AUSTA ENERGY ODA720-33V-MHD and AUSTA ENERGY ODA695-33V-MHD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.