Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595
VS
The verdict
595 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
585
595
Difference
Module efficiency
22.60 %
23.00 %
0.40 pp more efficient
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
585 Wp
595 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
585
19,628 kWh
595
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
585
595
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
585 W
595 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
560 W
569 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
534 W
543 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
509 W
517 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
585
595
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
585 Wp
595 Wp
+10 W for 595
Module efficiency
22.60 %
23.00 %
+0.40 pp for 595
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
+3.9 Wp/m² for 595
Open-circuit voltage
51.30 V
51.60 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.75 V
43.00 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.40 A
14.60 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.68 A
13.84 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
26.9 kg
26.9 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
46.0 kg/kWp
45.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,658
vs
#1,919
595 leads by 1,739 places
Power density
#3,500
vs
#1,758
595 leads by 1,742 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#947
vs
#645
595 leads by 302 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,037
vs
#3,239
595 leads by 798 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-590
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-580
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 or Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 use vs Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 and Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595?
Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-585 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM72N-HC-595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 40 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.