Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
VS
The verdict
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 205 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
Difference
Rated power
730 Wp
525 Wp
205 W more power
Weight
38.0 kg
26.9 kg
11.1 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
10 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
49.57 V
41.49 V
8.08 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.67 A
15.93 A
2.74 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.224 m²
0.883 m² apart
Voltage at max power
41.24 V
34.52 V
6.72 V apart
Current at max power
17.70 A
15.21 A
2.49 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
24,493 kWh
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
17,615 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
730 W
525 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
698 W
502 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
666 W
479 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
635 W
456 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
730 Wp
525 Wp
+205 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Module efficiency
23.50 %
23.60 %
Effectively the same
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
236.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.57 V
41.49 V
8.08 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.24 V
34.52 V
6.72 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.67 A
15.93 A
2.74 A apart
Current at max power
17.70 A
15.21 A
2.49 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.224 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
26.9 kg
-11.1 kg for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
51.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
+10 yrs for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#716
vs
#627
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 89 places
Power density
#800
vs
#645
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 155 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,495
vs
#4,630
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 leads by 865 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#199
vs
#2,432
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads by 2,233 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-530
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 or Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 23.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 use vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525?
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

