Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
VS
The verdict
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 220 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Difference
Rated power
510 Wp
730 Wp
220 W more power
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.50 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Weight
26.9 kg
38.0 kg
11.1 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
41.21 V
49.57 V
8.36 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.70 A
18.67 A
2.97 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Power density
229.3 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
5.7 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
34.29 V
41.24 V
6.95 V apart
Current at max power
14.87 A
17.70 A
2.83 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
17,112 kWh
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,381 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
510 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
488 W
698 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
466 W
666 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
443 W
635 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
510 Wp
730 Wp
+220 W for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.50 %
+0.60 pp for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Power density
229.3 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+5.7 Wp/m² for CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730
Open-circuit voltage
41.21 V
49.57 V
8.36 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.29 V
41.24 V
6.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.70 A
18.67 A
2.97 A apart
Current at max power
14.87 A
17.70 A
2.83 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
26.9 kg
38.0 kg
-11.1 kg for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,359
vs
#716
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads by 1,643 places
Power density
#2,343
vs
#800
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads by 1,543 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,400
vs
#5,495
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads by 905 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,700
vs
#199
CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 leads by 3,501 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-530
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-520
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 or Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730?
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 use vs Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730?
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730?
Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510 and Astronergy CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

