Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
VS
The verdict
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Difference
Module efficiency
22.50 %
23.20 %
0.70 pp more efficient
Rated power
450 Wp
515 Wp
65 W more power
Power density
225.2 Wp/m²
231.6 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
36.59 V
41.37 V
4.78 V apart
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
26.9 kg
2.4 kg lighter
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
30.51 V
34.42 V
3.91 V apart
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450
15,098 kWh
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
17,279 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,181 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
450 W
515 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
430 W
493 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
411 W
470 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
391 W
448 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
450 Wp
515 Wp
+65 W for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Module efficiency
22.50 %
23.20 %
+0.70 pp for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Power density
225.2 Wp/m²
231.6 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Open-circuit voltage
36.59 V
41.37 V
4.78 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.51 V
34.42 V
3.91 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.61 A
15.79 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.75 A
14.96 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.224 m²
0.226 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
26.9 kg
-2.4 kg for CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
-2.2 kg/kWp for CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,222
vs
#1,306
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 leads by 2,916 places
Power density
#4,225
vs
#1,473
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 leads by 2,752 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,755
vs
#5,704
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 leads by 3,051 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,225
vs
#3,194
CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 leads by 3,031 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-530
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-525
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-520
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-510
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-470
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 vs Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-465
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 or Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515?
According to our database: Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 has higher module efficiency (23.20% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 use vs Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 uses TOPCon cells; Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515?
Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 has a 30 years power warranty; Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 bifacial panels?
Both Astronergy CHSM48RN(DG)(BLH)/F-BH-450 and Astronergy CHSM54RN(DG)/F-BH-515 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 36 Astronergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

