Skip to main content
CME-132-725W vs AE CME-132-715 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132-715

AE Solar CME-132-725W
CME-132-725W
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon
VS
AE Solar AE CME-132-715
AE CME-132-715
715 Wp 23.04 % TOPCon
The verdict

4 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter CME-132-725W AE CME-132-715 Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Module efficiency 23.37 % 23.04 % 0.33 pp more efficient
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 230.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132-725W
24,325 kWh
AE CME-132-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132-725W AE CME-132-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132-725W AE CME-132-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp +10 W for CME-132-725W
Module efficiency 23.37 % 23.04 % +0.33 pp for CME-132-725W
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 230.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for CME-132-725W
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 48.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 41.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.46 A 18.40 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 31.5 kg 31.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 43.4 kg/kWp 44.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for AE CME-132-715
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#930 vs #1,711
CME-132-725W leads by 781 places
Power density
#923 vs #1,702
CME-132-725W leads by 779 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#299 vs #371
CME-132-725W leads by 72 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#230 vs #33
AE CME-132-715 leads by 197 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
4 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132-725W or AE Solar AE CME-132-715?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.04%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar AE CME-132-715?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE CME-132-715 is 23.04%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132-725W use vs AE Solar AE CME-132-715?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CME-132-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132-725W and AE Solar AE CME-132-715?
AE Solar CME-132-725 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.