AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
VS
The verdict
AE CME-132-715 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is weight: 5.5 kg lighter. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
7 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE CME-132-715
CME-132BDS-725W
Difference
Weight
31.5 kg
37.0 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
44.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
7.0 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency
23.04 %
23.37 %
0.33 pp more efficient
Power density
230.4 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
715 Wp
725 Wp
10 W more power
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AE CME-132-715
23,990 kWh
CME-132BDS-725W
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE CME-132-715
CME-132BDS-725W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
684 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
653 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
622 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE CME-132-715
CME-132BDS-725W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
725 Wp
+10 W for CME-132BDS-725W
Module efficiency
23.04 %
23.37 %
+0.33 pp for CME-132BDS-725W
Power density
230.4 Wp/m²
233.7 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725W
Open-circuit voltage
48.90 V
49.30 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.10 V
41.50 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.40 A
18.46 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.40 A
17.47 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
Same
Module area
3.103 m²
3.103 m²
Same
Weight
31.5 kg
37.0 kg
-5.5 kg for AE CME-132-715
Weight per kWp
44.1 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
-7.0 kg/kWp for AE CME-132-715
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for AE CME-132-715
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,711
vs
#930
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 781 places
Power density
#1,702
vs
#923
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 779 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#371
vs
#4,382
AE CME-132-715 leads by 4,011 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#33
vs
#249
AE CME-132-715 leads by 216 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CME-132-715 or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.04%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CME-132-715 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W?
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 has a module efficiency of 23.04%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CME-132-715 use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W?
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CME-132-715 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W?
AE Solar AE CME-132-715 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CME-132-715 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132-715 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.