Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
VS
The verdict
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is max input current per tracker: 10.0 A more headroom. 11 of 21 comparable parameters are identical, with 11 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 21 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 21 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SG25CX-P2
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Difference
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
40.0 A
10.0 A more headroom
European efficiency
98.2 %
98.6 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC power
25.00 kW
27.70 kW
2.70 kW apart
Max PV power
35.00 kW
37.50 kW
2.50 kW apart
Weight
38.0 kg
24.0 kg
14.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency
98.4 %
98.8 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Weight per kW
1.5 kg/kW
1.0 kg/kW
0.6 kg/kW lighter
DC/AC ratio
1.40
1.50
0.10 more oversizing headroom
MPPT voltage range
160-1000 V
200-1000 V
160-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Dimensions
575x645x245 mm
415x528x225 mm
575x645x245 mm vs 415x528x225 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
SG25CX-P2
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
25.00 kW
25.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
25.00 kW
27.70 kW
2.70 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
41.8 A
42.0 A
Effectively the same
PV input
Max PV power
35.00 kW
37.50 kW
2.50 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.40
1.50
+0.10 for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max DC voltage
1100 V
1100 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
160-1000 V
200-1000 V
160-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage
200 V
200 V
Same
MPP trackers
3
3
Same
Strings per tracker
2
-
Not published by Growatt
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
40.0 A
+10.0 A for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Efficiency
European efficiency
98.2 %
98.6 %
+0.4 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max efficiency
98.4 %
98.8 %
+0.4 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
38.0 kg
24.0 kg
-14.0 kg for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Weight per kW
1.5 kg/kW
1.0 kg/kW
-0.6 kg/kW for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Dimensions
575x645x245 mm
415x528x225 mm
575x645x245 mm vs 415x528x225 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
-
Yes
Not published by Sungrow
Ethernet
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection
Yes
-
Not published by Growatt
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
5 yrs
Not published by Sungrow
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
11 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
GoodWe
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs GoodWe GW25K-MT
9 differences, the largest is max ac power
Same type, similar size
Fronius International
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Fronius Verto 25.0 400
12 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.

