Skip to main content
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs SG25CX-P2 11 of 21 identical Swap Change inverters

Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Sungrow SG25CX-P2

Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Growatt
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
25 kW 98.6 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
VS
Sungrow SG25CX-P2
Sungrow
SG25CX-P2
25 kW 98.2 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is max input current per tracker: 10.0 A more headroom. 11 of 21 comparable parameters are identical, with 11 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
11 of 21 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 21 parameters
Parameter MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) SG25CX-P2 Difference
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A 10.0 A more headroom
European efficiency 98.6 % 98.2 % 0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC power 27.70 kW 25.00 kW 2.70 kW apart
Max PV power 37.50 kW 35.00 kW 2.50 kW apart
Weight 24.0 kg 38.0 kg 14.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency 98.8 % 98.4 % 0.4 pp more efficient
Weight per kW 1.0 kg/kW 1.5 kg/kW 0.6 kg/kW lighter
DC/AC ratio 1.50 1.40 0.10 more oversizing headroom
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 160-1000 V 200-1000 V vs 160-1000 V
Dimensions 415x528x225 mm 575x645x245 mm 415x528x225 mm vs 575x645x245 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) SG25CX-P2 Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 25.00 kW 25.00 kW Same
Max AC power 27.70 kW 25.00 kW 2.70 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 42.0 A 41.8 A Effectively the same
PV input
Max PV power 37.50 kW 35.00 kW 2.50 kW apart
DC/AC ratio 1.50 1.40 +0.10 for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1100 V Same
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 160-1000 V 200-1000 V vs 160-1000 V
Start voltage 200 V 200 V Same
MPP trackers 3 3 Same
Strings per tracker - 2 Not published by Growatt
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A +10.0 A for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Efficiency
European efficiency 98.6 % 98.2 % +0.4 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max efficiency 98.8 % 98.4 % +0.4 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 24.0 kg 38.0 kg -14.0 kg for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Weight per kW 1.0 kg/kW 1.5 kg/kW -0.6 kg/kW for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Dimensions 415x528x225 mm 575x645x245 mm 415x528x225 mm vs 575x645x245 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP66 Same
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature 60 °C 60 °C Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi Yes - Not published by Sungrow
Ethernet - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection - Yes Not published by Growatt
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty 5 yrs - Not published by Sungrow
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
6 differences, the largest is start voltage
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
5 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
GoodWe
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs GoodWe GW25K-MT
10 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04

Written summary

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.