Skip to main content
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs GW25K-MT 9 of 19 identical Swap Change inverters

Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs GoodWe GW25K-MT

Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Growatt
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
25 kW 98.6 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
VS
GoodWe GW25K-MT
GoodWe
GW25K-MT
25 kW 98.4 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is max input current per tracker: 10.0 A more headroom. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical, with 13 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) GW25K-MT Difference
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A 10.0 A more headroom
Weight 24.0 kg 40.0 kg 16.0 kg lighter
Max AC power 27.70 kW 27.50 kW 0.20 kW apart
Weight per kW 1.0 kg/kW 1.6 kg/kW 0.6 kg/kW lighter
European efficiency 98.6 % 98.4 % 0.2 pp more efficient
Max AC current 42.0 A 40.0 A 2.0 A apart
Ingress protection IP66 IP65 IP66 vs IP65
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 200-950 V 200-1000 V vs 200-950 V
Start voltage 200 V 180 V 20 V earlier start
Dimensions 415x528x225 mm 590x480x200 mm 415x528x225 mm vs 590x480x200 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) GW25K-MT Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 25.00 kW 25.00 kW Same
Max AC power 27.70 kW 27.50 kW 0.20 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 42.0 A 40.0 A 2.0 A apart
PV input
Max PV power 37.50 kW - Not published by GoodWe
DC/AC ratio 1.50 - Not published by GoodWe
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1100 V Same
MPPT voltage range 200-1000 V 200-950 V 200-1000 V vs 200-950 V
Start voltage 200 V 180 V -20 V for GW25K-MT
MPP trackers 3 - Not published by GoodWe
Strings per tracker - 2 Not published by Growatt
Max input current per tracker 40.0 A 30.0 A +10.0 A for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Efficiency
European efficiency 98.6 % 98.4 % +0.2 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max efficiency 98.8 % 98.7 % Effectively the same
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 24.0 kg 40.0 kg -16.0 kg for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Weight per kW 1.0 kg/kW 1.6 kg/kW -0.6 kg/kW for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Dimensions 415x528x225 mm 590x480x200 mm 415x528x225 mm vs 590x480x200 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP65 IP66 vs IP65
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature 60 °C 60 °C Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi Yes Yes Same
Ethernet - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty 5 yrs - Not published by GoodWe
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
6 differences, the largest is start voltage
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
5 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Fronius International
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Fronius Verto 25.0 400
12 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
04

Written summary

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.