Skip to main content
SG25CX-P2 vs MID 25KTL3-X1 11 of 22 identical Swap Change inverters

Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1

Sungrow SG25CX-P2
Sungrow
SG25CX-P2
25 kW 98.2 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
VS
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
Growatt
MID 25KTL3-X1
25 kW 98.5 % euro Grid-tie
Open inverter page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MID 25KTL3-X1 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is max input current per tracker: 4.0 A more headroom. 11 of 22 comparable parameters are identical, with 10 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
11 of 22 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 22 parameters
Parameter SG25CX-P2 MID 25KTL3-X1 Difference
Max input current per tracker 30.0 A 26.0 A 4.0 A more headroom
Max AC power 25.00 kW 27.70 kW 2.70 kW apart
Max PV power 35.00 kW 37.50 kW 2.50 kW apart
Weight 38.0 kg 29.5 kg 8.5 kg lighter
European efficiency 98.2 % 98.5 % 0.3 pp more efficient
Max efficiency 98.4 % 98.8 % 0.4 pp more efficient
DC/AC ratio 1.40 1.50 0.10 more oversizing headroom
Start voltage 200 V 250 V 50 V earlier start
Weight per kW 1.5 kg/kW 1.2 kg/kW 0.3 kg/kW lighter
MPPT voltage range 160-1000 V 200-1000 V 160-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Dimensions 575x645x245 mm 435x580x230 mm 575x645x245 mm vs 435x580x230 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter SG25CX-P2 MID 25KTL3-X1 Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 25.00 kW 25.00 kW Same
Max AC power 25.00 kW 27.70 kW 2.70 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 41.8 A 41.9 A Effectively the same
PV input
Max PV power 35.00 kW 37.50 kW 2.50 kW apart
DC/AC ratio 1.40 1.50 +0.10 for MID 25KTL3-X1
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1100 V Same
MPPT voltage range 160-1000 V 200-1000 V 160-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage 200 V 250 V -50 V for SG25CX-P2
MPP trackers 3 - Not published by Growatt
Strings per tracker 2 2 Same
Max input current per tracker 30.0 A 26.0 A +4.0 A for SG25CX-P2
Efficiency
European efficiency 98.2 % 98.5 % +0.3 pp for MID 25KTL3-X1
Max efficiency 98.4 % 98.8 % +0.4 pp for MID 25KTL3-X1
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 38.0 kg 29.5 kg -8.5 kg for MID 25KTL3-X1
Weight per kW 1.5 kg/kW 1.2 kg/kW -0.3 kg/kW for MID 25KTL3-X1
Dimensions 575x645x245 mm 435x580x230 mm 575x645x245 mm vs 435x580x230 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP66 Same
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature 60 °C 60 °C Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi - Yes Not published by Sungrow
Ethernet - Yes Not published by Sungrow
Arc fault protection Yes Yes Same
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty - 5 yrs Not published by Sungrow
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
10 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
GoodWe
Sungrow SG25CX-P2 vs GoodWe GW25K-MT
9 differences, the largest is max ac power
Same type, similar size
Fronius International
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1 vs Fronius Verto 25.0 400
10 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
04

Written summary

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.