Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
VS

Fronius International
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
29.99 kW
98.0 % euro
Hybrid
The verdict
12 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is european efficiency: 0.8 pp more efficient. 15 of 27 comparable parameters are identical, with 5 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 27 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 27 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MID 30K-HU
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Difference
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.0 %
0.8 pp more efficient
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
12.0 A more headroom
Max PV power
60.00 kW
39.00 kW
21.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.30
0.70 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
42 A
50 A
8 A faster charging
Weight
48.0 kg
43.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency
98.6 %
98.2 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC current
50.0 A
45.4 A
4.6 A apart
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Battery voltage
600-980 V
150-700
600-980 V vs 150-700
Start voltage
160 V
150 V
10 V earlier start
Dimensions
570x680x256 mm
865x574x279 mm
570x680x256 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
MID 30K-HU
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
30.00 kW
29.99 kW
Effectively the same
Max AC power
30.00 kW
29.99 kW
Effectively the same
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
50.0 A
45.4 A
4.6 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
60.00 kW
39.00 kW
21.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.30
+0.70 for MID 30K-HU
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1000 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Start voltage
160 V
150 V
-10 V for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
MPP trackers
-
3
Not published by Growatt
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
+12.0 A for MID 30K-HU
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.0 %
+0.8 pp for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Max efficiency
98.6 %
98.2 %
+0.4 pp for MID 30K-HU
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
600-980 V
150-700
600-980 V vs 150-700
Max charge current
42 A
50 A
+8 A for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Backup power
30.0 kW
-
Not published by Fronius International
Physical
Weight
48.0 kg
43.0 kg
-5.0 kg for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Weight per kW
1.6 kg/kW
1.4 kg/kW
Effectively the same
Dimensions
570x680x256 mm
865x574x279 mm
570x680x256 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
55 dB
57 dB
Effectively the same
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
Yes
Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection
Yes
Yes
Same
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
5 yrs
-
Not published by Fronius International
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H
10 differences, the largest is max efficiency
Same type, similar size
Deye
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Deye SUN-30K-SG01HP3-EU-BM3
15 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Growatt MID 30K-HU vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H-LV
11 differences, the largest is european efficiency
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
