Growatt MID 29.9K-HU vs Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
VS
Fronius International
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
29.99 kW
98.0 % euro
Hybrid
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is european efficiency: 0.8 pp more efficient. 14 of 27 comparable parameters are identical, with 5 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
14
of 27 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 27 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MID 29.9K-HU
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Difference
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.0 %
0.8 pp more efficient
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
12.0 A more headroom
Rated AC power
29.90 kW
29.99 kW
0.09 kW apart
Max PV power
59.80 kW
39.00 kW
20.80 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.30
0.70 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
42 A
50 A
8 A faster charging
Weight
48.0 kg
43.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency
98.6 %
98.2 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC power
29.90 kW
29.99 kW
0.09 kW apart
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Battery voltage
600-980 V
150-700
600-980 V vs 150-700
Start voltage
160 V
150 V
10 V earlier start
Dimensions
570x680x256 mm
865x574x279 mm
570x680x256 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
MID 29.9K-HU
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
29.90 kW
29.99 kW
0.09 kW apart
Max AC power
29.90 kW
29.99 kW
0.09 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
45.3 A
45.4 A
Effectively the same
PV input
Max PV power
59.80 kW
39.00 kW
20.80 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.30
+0.70 for MID 29.9K-HU
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1000 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Start voltage
160 V
150 V
-10 V for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
MPP trackers
-
3
Not published by Growatt
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
+12.0 A for MID 29.9K-HU
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.0 %
+0.8 pp for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Max efficiency
98.6 %
98.2 %
+0.4 pp for MID 29.9K-HU
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
600-980 V
150-700
600-980 V vs 150-700
Max charge current
42 A
50 A
+8 A for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Backup power
30.0 kW
-
Not published by Fronius International
Physical
Weight
48.0 kg
43.0 kg
-5.0 kg for Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus
Weight per kW
1.6 kg/kW
1.4 kg/kW
Effectively the same
Dimensions
570x680x256 mm
865x574x279 mm
570x680x256 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
55 dB
57 dB
Effectively the same
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
Yes
Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection
Yes
Yes
Same
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
5 yrs
-
Not published by Fronius International
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Deye
Growatt MID 29.9K-HU vs Deye SUN-29.9K-SG01HP3-EU-BM3
14 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 29.9K-HU vs Growatt WIT 29.9K-XHU
9 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Growatt MID 29.9K-HU vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H
12 differences, the largest is max efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus vs Growatt MID 30K-HU
12 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Deye
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus vs Deye SUN-30K-SG01HP3-EU-BM3
14 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Fronius Verto 30.0 Plus vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P30K-H-LV
14 differences, the largest is european efficiency
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.