Skip to main content
ECS4300H-H2 vs Tower Pro TP7 7 of 20 identical Swap Change batteries

FoxESS ECS4300H-H2 vs Dyness Tower Pro TP7

FoxESS ECS4300H-H2
ECS4300H-H2
7.46 kWh 95.0 % round-trip LFP HV
VS
Dyness Tower Pro TP7
Tower Pro TP7
7.3 kWh 95.0 % round-trip LFP HV
The verdict

13 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is usable energy: 0.16 kWh apart. 7 of 20 comparable parameters are identical, with 13 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
7 of 20 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

13 of 20 parameters
Parameter ECS4300H-H2 Tower Pro TP7 Difference
Usable energy 7.46 kWh 7.30 kWh 0.16 kWh apart
Cycle life 6000 cycles 8000 cycles 2000 cycles more
Max system capacity 29.0 kWh 23.0 kWh 5.9 kWh more room to expand
Nominal energy 8.29 kWh 7.68 kWh 0.61 kWh apart
Depth of discharge 90 % 95 % 5 pp more of the cells usable
Nominal voltage 115 V 192 V 77 V apart
Weight 78.5 kg 99.5 kg 21.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWh 10.5 kg/kWh 13.6 kg/kWh 3.1 kg/kWh lighter
Cycle test depth 90 % 95 % 5 pp apart
Ingress protection IP65 IP55 IP65 vs IP55
Modules per stack 2-7 2-6 2-7 vs 2-6
Operating voltage 97.2-131.4 V 168-219 V 97.2-131.4 V vs 168-219 V
Dimensions 366x570x380 mm 788x587x310 mm 366x570x380 mm vs 788x587x310 mm
02

Price offers

1 shop we track
Shop ECS4300H-H2 Tower Pro TP7 At this shop
Sklep Soltech Poland - 7 359.52 zł net Only Tower Pro TP7

All 1 offer for Tower Pro TP7

Shop prices by brand: See 31 FoxESS offers · See 26 Dyness offers

03

Full specification

Parameter ECS4300H-H2 Tower Pro TP7 Difference
Capacity
Usable energy 7.46 kWh 7.30 kWh 0.16 kWh apart
Nominal energy 8.29 kWh 7.68 kWh 0.61 kWh apart
Depth of discharge 90 % 95 % +5 pp for Tower Pro TP7
Max system capacity 29.0 kWh 23.0 kWh +5.9 kWh for ECS4300H-H2
Modules per stack 2-7 2-6 2-7 vs 2-6
Power
Continuous discharge power - 7.68 kW Not published by FoxESS
Continuous charge power - 7.68 kW Not published by FoxESS
Peak discharge power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Power per kWh - 1.05 kW/kWh Not published by FoxESS
Efficiency and lifetime
Round-trip efficiency 95.0 % 95.0 % Same
Cycle life 6000 cycles 8000 cycles +2000 cycles for Tower Pro TP7
Cycle test depth 90 % 95 % 5 pp apart
Capacity at end of life - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Self-discharge - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Electrical
Voltage class High voltage High voltage Same
Nominal voltage 115 V 192 V 77 V apart
Operating voltage 97.2-131.4 V 168-219 V 97.2-131.4 V vs 168-219 V
Cell chemistry LFP LFP Same
Active cell balancing - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Thermal management - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Built-in inverter
Inverter None (battery only) None (battery only) Same
Inverter power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Grid connection - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 78.5 kg 99.5 kg -21.0 kg for ECS4300H-H2
Weight per kWh 10.5 kg/kWh 13.6 kg/kWh -3.1 kg/kWh for ECS4300H-H2
Dimensions 366x570x380 mm 788x587x310 mm 366x570x380 mm vs 788x587x310 mm
Ingress protection IP65 IP55 IP65 vs IP55
Outdoor-rated Yes Yes Same
Min operating temperature -20 °C -20 °C Same
Max operating temperature 55 °C 55 °C Same
Warranty
Warranty - 15 yrs Not published by FoxESS
Warranted throughput - - Neither datasheet publishes this
04

More useful comparisons

Open all batteries
Similar capacity
FoxESS ECS4300H-H2 vs Deye GB-L8
10 differences, the largest is max system capacity
Similar capacity
FoxESS ECS4300H-H2 vs Deye GB-SL-EU (2 modules in series)
11 differences, the largest is max system capacity
Similar capacity
FoxESS ECS4300H-H2 vs BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 7.7
15 differences, the largest is usable energy
Similar capacity
Dyness Tower Pro TP7 vs FoxESS HS7.5
11 differences, the largest is cycle life
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.