Clelo Tech vs Trina Solar - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
Clelo Tech
China · est. 2017Trina Solar
China · est. 1997
Panel models
7
vs
305
Max power
720 W
vs
740 W
Max efficiency
23.20%
vs
24.10%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
39%
At a glance
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (305 vs 7 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Clelo Tech leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Clelo Tech
Website
Jiangsu Clelo Material Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar manufacturer and system integrator based in Changshu, Suzhou, specializing in photovoltaic panels, BIPV technology, and complete PV power plant solutions. The company offers products and turnkey systems ranging from small residential installations to...
Headquarters
Changshu, China
Founded
2017
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Trina Solar
Website
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Founded
1997
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
Clelo Tech
|
Trina Solar
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 7 | 305 +298 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 740 W +20 W |
| Avg Power | 705 W +199 W | 506 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.10% +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.70% +1.19 pp | 21.51% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.064 | -0.304%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (100%) +61 pp | 119 (39%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +1.9 yr | 28.1 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandClelo Tech
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JT720SLkB Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | JT715SLkB Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | JT710SLkB Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | JT705SLkB Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | JT700SLkB Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | JT695SLkB Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | JT690SLkB Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Trina Solar
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TSM-NEG21C.20-740 Bi | 740W | 23.8% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | TSM-NEG21C.20-735 Bi | 735W | 23.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | TSM-NEG21C.20-730 Bi | 730W | 23.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | TSM-NEG21C.20-725 Bi | 725W | 23.3% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | TSM-NE21 725W | 725W | 23.3% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | TSM-NEG21C.20 725W Bi | 725W | 23.3% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | TSM-NE21 720W | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | TSM-NEG21C.20-720 Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | TSM-720NEG21C.20 Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | TSM-NEG21C.20 720W Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 7 panels average
Efficiency
22.70%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
23.37%
Temp coeff
-0.290%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Clelo Tech skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Clelo Tech offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Clelo Tech Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Trina Solar Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (70%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.