Centro Energy vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 13 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Centro Energy offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
Centro Energy and Jinko Solar occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV industry. Centro Energy is a smaller manufacturer with production facilities in China and Vietnam, offering a narrow portfolio of 13 panel models built exclusively on PERC cell technology, with no bifacial products available. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China with shares listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest PV module manufacturers, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,800 employees, and an estimated 13% share of global module shipments in 2025. Critically, Jinko Solar holds Tier 1 bankable status - a designation Centro Energy does not carry - which directly affects a project's ability to secure third-party financing from banks and institutional lenders.
From a technology standpoint, Jinko Solar leads across every measurable metric in the provided data. Its maximum module efficiency reaches 24.8% versus 21.57% for Centro Energy, and its average temperature coefficient of Pmax is -0.308%/°C compared to -0.404%/°C for Centro Energy - a meaningful real-world advantage in warm or variable climates. Jinko's 545-model portfolio includes approximately 32% bifacial panels and nearly 40% TOPCon N-type modules, supported by a documented world-record laboratory cell efficiency of 27.79% for TOPCon cells independently verified by Germany's ISFH. This breadth makes Jinko suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount farms alike - including projects in Poland and across Europe where the company maintains active distribution agreements. Centro Energy's 100% PERC, zero-bifacial portfolio limits it primarily to straightforward residential applications where cost minimization is the dominant criterion.
For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear default for any project requiring bankability, high efficiency, bifacial gain, or access to cutting-edge N-type TOPCon technology. Centro Energy may remain relevant in price-sensitive residential segments where Tier 1 status is not a contractual requirement and where a simpler PERC module suffices, but it cannot compete with Jinko Solar on technology leadership, portfolio depth, or institutional credibility.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.