BYD vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 115 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. BYD leans bifacial (95% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 1995
- Headquarters
- Shenzhen, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 002594
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
BYD offers more 600W+ panels (41% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (63%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
BYD, founded in 1995 in China and globally recognized as a leader in batteries and electric vehicles, operates a solar module division as part of its broader clean energy strategy, with shares listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Its solar portfolio spans 115 panel models, reaching a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 23.66%. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has grown into one of the world's largest dedicated solar module manufacturers, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,000 employees, and more than 300 GW of modules installed globally. Jinko's catalog covers 545 models, with its flagship Tiger Neo series achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status, qualifying them for project finance from major lending institutions, and both lead their portfolios with TOPCon cell technology - though BYD allocates a higher share of its lineup to TOPCon at 62.6%, compared to 39.4% for Jinko Solar.
BYD's most distinctive portfolio characteristic is its near-universal bifacial offering: 94.78% of its modules are bifacial, making it a strong fit for residential rooftop installs on light-colored surfaces and ground-mount systems where rear-side irradiance gains are feasible. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C is marginally better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, an advantage during peak summer generation periods. BYD's average module power of approximately 565 Wp reflects a focused, high-wattage lineup. Jinko Solar's 545-model portfolio provides broad commercial flexibility, with its Tiger Neo series best suited for space-constrained commercial and industrial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount projects where output density is critical. Jinko's 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer and its NYSE listing add layers of reliability assurance and financial transparency that resonate with large-scale project developers and lenders.
For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the stronger option for utility-scale and commercial C&I projects requiring maximum efficiency, a wide product range, and a globally audited financial track record. BYD presents a compelling case for bifacial-focused residential and small commercial projects, particularly where its parent company's vertical integration in cell and battery manufacturing provides supply chain continuity - and where the slightly superior temperature coefficient can translate into meaningful seasonal yield advantages.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.