Skip to main content

Bruk-Bet vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Bruk-Bet
Poland Founded 1984
Read the Bruk-Bet review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 20 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
20 89
Highest power
480 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
22.2% 23.2%
Average efficiency
20.8% 21.2%
Bifacial share
20% 39%
Average warranty
26 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Bruk-Bet

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...

Founded
1984
Headquarters
Nieciecza, Poland
Employees
1000+
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Bruk-Bet Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 20 89+69
Max Power 480 W 675 W+195 W
Avg Power 416 W 468 W+52 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.17% 23.20%+1.03 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.80% 21.21%+0.41 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.324%/°C+0.000 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 4 (20%) 35 (39%)+19 pp
Avg Warranty 26.5 yrs 27.0 yrs+0.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Bruk-Bet cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (75%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Bruk-Bet is a Polish manufacturer headquartered in Tarnow, operating under the broader Bruk-Bet SA construction group, which has been active for more than three decades. The company launched its photovoltaic division in 2011 under the name Georyt Solar and has since built a dedicated module plant in Tarnow. As of the most recent publicly confirmed figure, annual production capacity reached 120 MW after a significant expansion - though no current data suggests the company has scaled meaningfully beyond that level. Bruk-Bet does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists and is best understood as a regional European manufacturer with a domestic-market focus. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korea's Hanwha Group, has far broader institutional reach: it holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, and its global module production capacity exceeds 11 GW per year, with a major U.S. manufacturing hub in Georgia adding several additional gigawatts of domestic output. In terms of bankability and global footprint, Q-Cells stands considerably above Bruk-Bet.

On the product side, Bruk-Bet focuses on crystalline silicon modules using PERC cell technology with half-cut configurations and glass-glass construction, targeting residential rooftops and smaller commercial installations in Poland and Central Europe. Q-Cells serves a much wider range of use cases - from premium residential installations to utility-scale ground-mount projects - and its flagship Q.ANTUM NEO platform, which incorporates TOPCon cell architecture, reaches efficiencies above 22 percent. Its temperature coefficients are notably competitive, making the panels well suited to warm climates. Warranty terms at Q-Cells extend to 25 years on product and performance, with low annual degradation rates confirmed by independent reviewers.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default choice given its Tier 1 bankability, superior technology generation, global service network, and long warranty track record. Bruk-Bet remains a credible option for buyers who specifically require EU-origin manufacturing or who are sourcing for smaller Polish residential projects where local distribution and support matter.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Bruk-Bet A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Bruk-Bet AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Bruk-Bet AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 23 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.