Skip to main content

Becquer vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Becquer
Headquarters not published
Read the Becquer review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 6 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Becquer leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
6 637
Highest power
715 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.0% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.6% 22.2%
Bifacial share
100% 36%
Average warranty
25 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Becquer Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 6 637+631
Max Power 715 W 735 W+20 W
Avg Power 702 W+180 W 523 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.00% 24.80%+1.80 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.62%+0.44 pp 22.18%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.250%/°C+0.054 -0.304%/°C
Bifacial Share 6 (100%)+64 pp 231 (36%)
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Becquer offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

Becquer cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Becquer and Jinko Solar represent two very different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Becquer is a Singapore-headquartered company founded in 2016, operating primarily across 14 states in India, with no documented presence in European markets. It offers a focused portfolio of just 6 panel models, all built exclusively on HJT (Heterojunction) cell technology, and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status. Jinko Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2006 in China, is listed on the NYSE, employs over 33,800 people, and operates a production capacity of 130 GW. It has maintained Tier 1 status for many years running and consistently ranks among the top two global module shipment leaders, with a catalogue of 545 products covering a wide range of watt classes and applications.

On the technology side, Becquer's entire portfolio is HJT and 100% bifacial, delivering an average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.25%/°C - notably better than Jinko's average of -0.308%/°C - and an average module power of 702.5 Wp, reflecting a tightly focused premium product line suited to high-efficiency rooftop installs and building-integrated PV applications where low thermal losses matter. Jinko's flagship technology is TOPCon, present in approximately 39% of its portfolio, with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% - both figures exceeding Becquer's maximum of 23%. Jinko's broad catalogue, averaging 511 Wp across all products and peaking at 735 Wp, makes it suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount developments alike, backed by an average warranty of around 28.5 years and a globally established service network.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice wherever bankability, supply-chain reliability, and proven field performance are priorities - which covers the vast majority of commercial, C&I, and utility-scale procurement. Becquer offers a technically compelling HJT proposition for buyers focused specifically on premium low-temperature-coefficient bifacial modules, but the absence of Tier 1 status, the narrow product range, and the lack of a European distribution and service footprint make it a harder sell outside its home markets of India and Singapore until these gaps are addressed.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Becquer A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Becquer AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Becquer AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.