Becquer vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 6 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Becquer leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Becquer offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
Becquer and Jinko Solar represent two very different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Becquer is a Singapore-headquartered company founded in 2016, operating primarily across 14 states in India, with no documented presence in European markets. It offers a focused portfolio of just 6 panel models, all built exclusively on HJT (Heterojunction) cell technology, and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status. Jinko Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2006 in China, is listed on the NYSE, employs over 33,800 people, and operates a production capacity of 130 GW. It has maintained Tier 1 status for many years running and consistently ranks among the top two global module shipment leaders, with a catalogue of 545 products covering a wide range of watt classes and applications.
On the technology side, Becquer's entire portfolio is HJT and 100% bifacial, delivering an average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.25%/°C - notably better than Jinko's average of -0.308%/°C - and an average module power of 702.5 Wp, reflecting a tightly focused premium product line suited to high-efficiency rooftop installs and building-integrated PV applications where low thermal losses matter. Jinko's flagship technology is TOPCon, present in approximately 39% of its portfolio, with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% - both figures exceeding Becquer's maximum of 23%. Jinko's broad catalogue, averaging 511 Wp across all products and peaking at 735 Wp, makes it suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount developments alike, backed by an average warranty of around 28.5 years and a globally established service network.
For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice wherever bankability, supply-chain reliability, and proven field performance are priorities - which covers the vast majority of commercial, C&I, and utility-scale procurement. Becquer offers a technically compelling HJT proposition for buyers focused specifically on premium low-temperature-coefficient bifacial modules, but the absence of Tier 1 status, the narrow product range, and the lack of a European distribution and service footprint make it a harder sell outside its home markets of India and Singapore until these gaps are addressed.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.