Skip to main content

ASM vs RMCIP - solar panel manufacturer comparison

ASM
Australia Founded 2009
Read the ASM review
VS
RMCIP
Russia Founded 1963
Read the RMCIP review
At a glance

ASM leads on peak efficiency at 16.00%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
1 1
Highest power
170 Wp 200 Wp
Best efficiency
16.0% 12.4%
Average efficiency
16.0% 12.4%
Bifacial share
0% 0%
Average warranty
- 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
ASM

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Employees
1-10
RMCIP

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...

Founded
1963
Headquarters
Ryazan, Russia
Annual capacity
<0.1 GW/year
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric ASM RMCIP
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 1 1
Max Power 170 W 200 W+30 W
Avg Power 170 W 200 W+30 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 16.00%+3.60 pp 12.40%
Avg Efficiency 16.00%+3.60 pp 12.40%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.438%/°C -0.400%/°C+0.038
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty - 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band
ASM cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
RMCIP cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

ASM, which stands for Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a small panel assembler headquartered in Australia. Rather than fabricating cells domestically, it sources components from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China and assembles modules locally. The company is not listed on any published BloombergNEF Tier 1 roster and operates at a scale that would be described as cottage-industry relative to gigawatt-class Asian producers. RMCIP - Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC - is a Russian industrial manufacturer based in Ryazan that has produced solar modules as one of several product lines, reflecting its origins as a precision-ceramics and instrumentation enterprise. Neither brand appears on mainstream bankability lists, and neither commands a meaningful share of global module shipments. Of the two, ASM has a slightly more visible presence in English-language installer forums, though that advantage is modest.

ASM's catalogued modules are monocrystalline and sit in a lower wattage bracket more suited to small residential or off-grid applications in the Australian market, where local assembly can carry procurement or rebate advantages. RMCIP's crystalline monocrystalline lineup spans a wider power range - from small 12-volt off-grid panels up to modules in the 270 W class - at efficiency levels that reflect an older cell generation rather than contemporary TOPCon or HJT technology. Both brands are therefore most naturally positioned for niche deployments: ASM for buyers who prioritise local Australian content, and RMCIP for buyers within or near Russia seeking a domestically produced module for standalone or small-grid installations.

For a typical buyer outside those specific national contexts in 2025, neither brand would be a default recommendation over established Tier 1 manufacturers with stronger warranty backing, higher efficiency, and widely available installer support networks. The choice between ASM and RMCIP is largely irrelevant to most international projects and should only arise when local sourcing requirements or regional supply constraints make one of them the practical option.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
ASM A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar RMCIP
Manufacturers
ASM AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO RMCIP
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar RMCIP
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.