ARTsolar vs G-STAR - solar panel manufacturer comparison
G-STAR has the broader catalog (36 vs 0 models). G-STAR leans bifacial (86% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
G-STAR skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+
G-STAR offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (72%)
The flagships
Written summary
ARTsolar is a South African manufacturer founded in 2010 and widely recognized as the country's only 100% locally owned PV module producer. Its facility, equipped with Swiss and German technology and operated in partnership with JA Solar, runs at a production capacity of roughly 250 MW per year - a modest footprint by global standards. G-STAR Pte. Ltd., headquartered in Singapore and established around 2019, operates at a significantly larger scale, with integrated production capacity in Southeast Asia projected at approximately 3 GW by 2025 and a total claimed capacity of 17.5 GW. The company ranked 467th on the 2024 Global Top 500 New Energy Enterprises list. Neither manufacturer appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, which puts both outside the institutional comfort zone required for large non-recourse financed projects. Between the two, G-STAR carries the stronger international footprint by volume, while ARTsolar holds a unique strategic position as a domestic producer serving South Africa's localization-driven procurement environment.
On portfolio character, the two brands diverge noticeably. ARTsolar's current lineup consists of a single panel rated at 600 Wp with a peak efficiency of 23.21%, built entirely on TOPCon cell technology, with no bifacial option available. Its temperature coefficient sits at -0.31% per degree Celsius. G-STAR fields a broader catalog of 12 panels averaging 517.5 Wp and reaching up to 595 Wp, with an average efficiency of 22.27% and a top efficiency of 23.03%. Roughly 58% of its lineup is bifacial and built on TOPCon, with the remainder using older architectures. G-STAR's temperature coefficient averages -0.30% per degree Celsius - marginally better in hot climates. Both brands offer 30-year warranties. ARTsolar's single high-power offering suits contractors looking for a straightforward, high-efficiency commercial or large residential module with local South African content. G-STAR's wider range and bifacial options make it more adaptable to varied project types, from standard rooftops to small ground-mount installations where rear-side gain matters.
For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice depends heavily on geography and project type. Within South Africa, ARTsolar carries a clear procurement advantage wherever local content requirements apply, and its 600 Wp, 23.21% module is competitive at the technical level. For buyers outside South Africa - or for projects where bifacial panels add meaningful yield - G-STAR's broader catalog and larger manufacturing base offer more flexibility, though the lack of Tier 1 status means project finance will still require additional due diligence for either brand. The two are genuinely comparable on efficiency and warranty terms; the real differentiators are geographic context and product breadth, not raw panel performance.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.