AKCOME vs VNS Bulgaria - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
VNS Bulgaria Ltd. was established in 2009 and focuses on manufacturing and construction of solar street lighting, solar park lighting, LED street lamps, photovoltaic systems, and various other solar systems. The company utilizes innovative technologies in its designs and constructions and has completed over 1000...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Kurdjali, Bulgaria
- Annual capacity
- null GW/year
- Employees
- null
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2003 and headquartered in Jiangsu Province, with a decade-long focus on heterojunction (HJT) cell technology. Its panels are listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the company has been a visible participant in international solar trade shows, though it was removed from the Bloomberg Tier 1 module bankability list as of early 2025 after its product listings became inaccessible - a meaningful flag for project finance purposes. VNS Bulgaria, by contrast, is a small Bulgarian firm founded in 2009 that functions primarily as a regional distributor and reseller of panels from established brands such as LONGi, JA Solar, and Trina Solar, rather than as an original equipment manufacturer. It carries no known Tier 1 designation, no disclosed production capacity, and holds no public listing. On institutional footprint, AKCOME is the clear leader of the two, though its lapsed bankability status limits its edge for financed utility projects.
AKCOME's sampled portfolio of three panels is entirely HJT and entirely bifacial, which positions it firmly at the premium end of the technology spectrum. Average output sits at 672 Wp with a ceiling of 700 Wp, and average front-side efficiency reaches 21.6%, peaking at 22.54% - competitive figures even against top-tier HJT rivals. The average temperature coefficient of -0.24%/degree C is exceptionally low, meaning real-world output losses in hot climates are minimized. A 30-year average product warranty further underlines a premium positioning suited to discerning residential buyers and performance-sensitive commercial rooftop projects. VNS Bulgaria presents no proprietary panel data in the dataset - zero panels catalogued under its own brand, with no power, efficiency, or warranty figures available. This reflects its role as a trade intermediary rather than a manufacturer, making any direct specification-level comparison impossible.
For a buyer choosing between these two in 2025, AKCOME offers a concrete, technically distinguished HJT lineup worth evaluating for high-efficiency rooftop or small commercial applications, provided the buyer is comfortable with its current non-Tier-1 status and can secure financing independently. VNS Bulgaria is not a meaningful alternative as a panel brand - buyers engaging with it are effectively purchasing third-party modules under a reseller umbrella, and should evaluate whichever OEM brands it currently stocks on their own merits.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.