AEET vs Jolywood - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 5 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Taizhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 300393
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)
The flagships
Written summary
AEET Energy Group GmbH and Jolywood represent opposite ends of the solar manufacturing spectrum. AEET is a small German-registered firm with no Tier 1 bankability rating and a portfolio of just five panel models, while Jolywood (Suzhou) Sunwatt Co., Ltd. is a China-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2008, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE: 300393), and recognized as Tier 1 bankable, with module production capacity approaching 10 GW and cell production capacity reported near 20 GW. Jolywood was among the earliest commercial-scale adopters of n-type TOPCon technology and carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint - it is independently bankable, exchange-listed, and has a documented record of high-volume project supply.
The portfolio contrast is equally stark. AEET's five products average 190 Wp and peak at 200 Wp, with an average efficiency of 14.9% and a top efficiency of 15.7%; cell technology is unspecified and no bifacial panels are offered, suggesting a legacy or low-margin product line suited primarily to small budget installations and off-grid applications where output density is not a priority. The 25-year warranty is standard for the industry. Jolywood's 128-panel catalogue, by contrast, averages 553.6 Wp and reaches 715 Wp at the top end, with an average efficiency of 22.5% and a peak of 23.6% - both well above the current mainstream. Roughly 86% of Jolywood's lineup is bifacial and 95% uses TOPCon cells, making it a strong fit for utility-scale ground mounts, large commercial rooftops, and any project where land use or energy yield per installed watt matters. Jolywood's standard 30-year warranty exceeds AEET's by five years.
For the vast majority of buyers in 2025 - whether residential, commercial, or utility - Jolywood is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 bankability is essential for project financing, its bifacial TOPCon technology delivers meaningfully higher yield, and its deep 128-model catalogue provides flexibility across power classes. AEET's narrow, low-output lineup and unspecified cell technology leave it relevant only in cost-sensitive niche applications where legacy module specs are acceptable and institutional financing is not a factor.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.