Skip to main content

AEET vs Jolywood - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AEET
Headquarters not published
Read the AEET review
VS
Jolywood
China Founded 2008 Tier 1
Read the Jolywood review
At a glance

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 5 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
5 128
Highest power
200 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
15.7% 23.6%
Average efficiency
14.9% 22.5%
Bifacial share
0% 86%
Average warranty
25 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jolywood
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Taizhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AEET Jolywood
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 5 128+123
Max Power 200 W 715 W+515 W
Avg Power 190 W 554 W+364 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 15.70% 23.60%+7.90 pp
Avg Efficiency 14.90% 22.54%+7.64 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.284%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 110 (86%)+86 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 30.0 yrs+5.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)

AEET cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

Jolywood cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AEET Energy Group GmbH and Jolywood represent opposite ends of the solar manufacturing spectrum. AEET is a small German-registered firm with no Tier 1 bankability rating and a portfolio of just five panel models, while Jolywood (Suzhou) Sunwatt Co., Ltd. is a China-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2008, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE: 300393), and recognized as Tier 1 bankable, with module production capacity approaching 10 GW and cell production capacity reported near 20 GW. Jolywood was among the earliest commercial-scale adopters of n-type TOPCon technology and carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint - it is independently bankable, exchange-listed, and has a documented record of high-volume project supply.

The portfolio contrast is equally stark. AEET's five products average 190 Wp and peak at 200 Wp, with an average efficiency of 14.9% and a top efficiency of 15.7%; cell technology is unspecified and no bifacial panels are offered, suggesting a legacy or low-margin product line suited primarily to small budget installations and off-grid applications where output density is not a priority. The 25-year warranty is standard for the industry. Jolywood's 128-panel catalogue, by contrast, averages 553.6 Wp and reaches 715 Wp at the top end, with an average efficiency of 22.5% and a peak of 23.6% - both well above the current mainstream. Roughly 86% of Jolywood's lineup is bifacial and 95% uses TOPCon cells, making it a strong fit for utility-scale ground mounts, large commercial rooftops, and any project where land use or energy yield per installed watt matters. Jolywood's standard 30-year warranty exceeds AEET's by five years.

For the vast majority of buyers in 2025 - whether residential, commercial, or utility - Jolywood is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 bankability is essential for project financing, its bifacial TOPCon technology delivers meaningfully higher yield, and its deep 128-model catalogue provides flexibility across power classes. AEET's narrow, low-output lineup and unspecified cell technology leave it relevant only in cost-sensitive niche applications where legacy module specs are acceptable and institutional financing is not a factor.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AEET A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jolywood
Manufacturers
AEET AIKO
Manufacturers
AKCOME Jolywood
Manufacturers
AEET ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Jolywood
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.