AEET vs Clelo Tech - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AEET
HQ unknownClelo Tech
China · est. 2017
Panel models
5
vs
7
Max power
200 W
vs
720 W
Max efficiency
15.70%
vs
23.20%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
100%
At a glance
Clelo Tech has the broader catalog (7 vs 5 models). Clelo Tech leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Clelo Tech leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AEET
Headquarters
-
Founded
-
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Clelo Tech
Website
Jiangsu Clelo Material Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar manufacturer and system integrator based in Changshu, Suzhou, specializing in photovoltaic panels, BIPV technology, and complete PV power plant solutions. The company offers products and turnkey systems ranging from small residential installations to...
Headquarters
Changshu, China
Founded
2017
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AEET
|
Clelo Tech
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 5 | 7 +2 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 720 W +520 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 705 W +515 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.20% +7.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.70% +7.80 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.240%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 7 (100%) +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs +5.0 yr |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAEET
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SE200M(24)F | 200W | 15.7% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SE195M(24)F | 195W | 15.3% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SE190M(24)F | 190W | 14.9% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SE185M(24)F | 185W | 14.5% | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SE180M(24)F | 180W | 14.1% | - | Monocrystalline |
Clelo Tech
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JT720SLkB Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | JT715SLkB Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | JT710SLkB Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | JT705SLkB Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | JT700SLkB Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | JT695SLkB Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | JT690SLkB Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 5 panels average
Efficiency
14.90%
Temp coeff
-
Top 7 panels average
Efficiency
22.70%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Clelo Tech skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Clelo Tech offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AEET Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Clelo Tech Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.