Sunlike Solar vs Sunpro - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Sunlike Solar has the broader catalog (135 vs 0 models). Sunlike Solar leans bifacial (42% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Sunlike Solar Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise specializing in researching, developing, designing, and producing new energy and renewable energy products. They offer various high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells and solar modules ranging from 200W to 750W. Their production capacity has...
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
- Annual capacity
- 2 GW/year
- Employees
- 300
JinkoSolar is one of the largest and most innovative solar module manufacturers in the world. The company distributes its solar products and sells its solutions and services to a diversified international utility, commercial and residential customer base. JinkoSolar has built a vertically integrated solar product...
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 85-100 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Sunlike Solar skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+
Sunlike Solar offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)
The flagships
Written summary
Sunlike Solar is a Chinese module manufacturer based in Wuxi, Jiangsu, founded around 2010, with a relatively modest annual production scale reported at roughly 2 GW. Independent, large-scale verification of its bankability status is limited, and no clear BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing could be confirmed for the brand. Sunpro Power, formally Zhejiang Sunpro Power Technology Co., Ltd., is headquartered in Yuhuan, Zhejiang, founded in 2018, and has been cited by multiple industry trade listings as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module supplier since the second quarter of 2022, with reported annual capacity in the 2 to 3 GW range spread across sites in Yuhuan and Wuxi plus an added Indonesian line. On institutional footprint, Sunpro currently presents the stronger case, given its documented Tier 1 recognition and broader export reach into over 100 countries, while Sunlike's standing rests mainly on catalog and distributor listings rather than independent bankability confirmation.
Both brands sell comparable product families aimed at similar buyers: monocrystalline PERC and TOPCon bifacial modules in the 400 to 700 watt range, positioned for residential rooftops, commercial installations, and some utility-scale ground-mount use. Sunlike's lineup spans older polycrystalline and M6-format panels alongside newer M10 TOPCon bifacial modules, with warranties typically quoted at 15 to 30 years and peak efficiencies cited around 23.5 percent in third-party comparisons. Sunpro's catalog leans more heavily on current-generation N-type TOPCon bifacial panels in the 440 to 595 watt class, generally paired with 15-year product and 30-year power warranties, though some retailer listings show inconsistent technology labeling that suggests looser quality control in how the catalog is documented.
For a typical buyer in 2025, Sunpro is the somewhat safer default thanks to its referenced Tier 1 bankability status and more consistent TOPCon-focused modern lineup, which matters for financing and long-term project insurance. Sunlike Solar is not necessarily inferior on paper, but its thinner independent verification and smaller, more mixed product generation make it a harder brand to recommend without direct lender or installer confirmation. In practice, for non-critical residential installs where financing bankability is less of a concern, the two brands may be close to interchangeable, but utility-scale or lender-backed projects should favor the better-documented Tier 1 track record.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-10-25
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.